Minkyweasel World

One Girl's Outlook On Life

Archive for the ‘Law’ Category

All over now

Posted by Shirley Anne on January 12, 2012

Proven Guilty (novel)

Image via Wikipedia

Today became the last day of my jury service. The case I was involved with drew to a close just after noon and we went to the jurors room to make our deliberations. We were divided 11 to 1 but after discussing certain points we soon arrived at a majority verdict. I had been selected as forewoman by lot, in this case the tossing of a coin. Only myself and one other woman were prepared to act as foreperson. It took a mere twenty-five minutes to reach a verdict and I knocked on the door to let the usher know. She asked if we had reached a unanimous verdict to which I replied ‘yes’. She then went into court and returned ten minutes later to escort us in. After we had all been seated (I had to take up a position next to the judge) the clerk of the court asked for the forewoman of the jury to stand. I stood up and waited for her to ask if we as a jury had reached a verdict. I replied ‘yes’. She then asked if that verdict was accepted by each of us. I replied ‘yes’. She then asked if the verdict was guilty or not guilty. I replied ‘Guilty’. The judge then informed the defendant of the verdict and the court that the sentencing would be carried out at a later date following social reports. We were dismissed from the courtroom and off we went to the main waiting area. It was around 1.15. We could not leave the building in case our services were needed in another trial. Eventually we were called to the reception, that is our group only and we were then released not only for the day but from our jury duty until and if they call upon us next time which under normal circumstances won’t be for another two years. The receptionist apologised to me for giving me bad news for I had indicated that I would have loved to continue as a juror for a little longer. The reason being there was only one trial awaiting a jury and some folk had not yet had the chance to serve on a jury after being there almost two weeks! The whole experience has been wonderful for me and although I had done jury service before that occasion was more than 27 years ago and I don’t remember too much about it. When I arrived back home there were messages on my phone asking for my services as an electrician. I now have a job to do in the morning!

Shirley Anne

Posted in Law, Work | Tagged: , , , , , | 2 Comments »

Maybe more?

Posted by Shirley Anne on January 11, 2012

The case on which I am currently serving as a juror could possibly be over by noon tomorrow but of course I cannot say anything more about the case than that. If it happens that way I would then become available for more jury service, however it is rumoured that not many jurors are selected for new cases on a Friday. I don’t know if that is true but it could be the case that a jury gets selected for a case which is scheduled for the following Monday. I am open to be selected if that is the case but we shall see. I had another eventful and quite interesting day today and I shall miss my experiences when it is all over. If nothing else, I have met some very interesting people over the last two weeks.

Shirley Anne

Posted in Law | Leave a Comment »

More trials

Posted by Shirley Anne on January 10, 2012

Today I arrived at court a little earlier and I awaited a call to sit on the next jury panel. A jury panel is when you are elected to go as a juror on a particular case. They take fifteen people into the courtroom where that case is about to start. They select jurors randomly and as your name is called you answer ‘yes’ and proceed to the jury box, simply two rows of seating to one side of the room. When all the jurors are seated they are then sworn in one at a time for that case. The remaining three would-be jurors (panelists) then leave the court and return to the main waiting area. I was called upon as a juror on a case again today and was the first person selected. It is estimated that the case will last two or three days and if that is correct my jury service will be completed. Just prior to be called to the panel for this case I had been called as a panelist to another case which is estimated to last for eight weeks! In such cases they take many panelists in groups until they have the twelve who are willing to spare their time for that long and who are accepted with no objections from the accused. The process can take some time. I suspect the reason I wasn’t selected, together with another two people to even get in the courtroom for that case was the fact that each of us had a family member who was part of the judicial system for the locality associated with it, in this case the county of Lancashire. My son is a policeman who is stationed in Lancashire. I would have liked being on that case but it was not to be.

Shirley Anne

Posted in Law | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

The trials of life

Posted by Shirley Anne on January 9, 2012

Kleroterion. This device was used for the jury...

Image via Wikipedia

Well not exactly. I was in court again today on another case. As it turned out it was very short indeed. After listening to the case for the prosecution and then for the defence, which was taken on by the defendant, we adjourned for lunch. After lunch the judge summarised then addressed the jury as to our responsibilities with regard to the law. We left the court to deliberate and were back ten minutes later with a verdict. Guilty as charged. The guy had already confessed to the crime of cultivating cannabis in his house when the police were called regarding an unrelated incident. Had he not done so there would have been no case to answer for the police would not have known. He was to brought court thinking he could persuade the jury to ‘nullify’ the law, something we obviously cannot do. Pleading the benefits of taking cannabis for medical reasons and that he hadn’t therefore committed a crime makes no difference when the law as it stands was breached. According to the evidence the prospective street value of his nursery was £4000-£8000. The judge will pass sentence at a later date pending reports. A bit of a waste of the court’s time in my estimation. I will report again tomorrow for more jury service. There are several cases yet to be heard.

Shirley Anne

Posted in Law | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Trial update

Posted by Shirley Anne on January 5, 2012

During the proceedings both yesterday and today we, the jurors, were dismissed from court a couple of times so that matters of law could be discussed outside of our hearing. This afternoon the same thing happened and when we returned after about ten minutes or so the judge informed us that because of the lack of solid evidence and the inconsistency of the woman’s account he was going to direct the jury to return a verdict of not guilty. A foreman was appointed for we hadn’t reached that decision between ourselves yet and he announced a not guilty verdict in response to the clerk of the court‘s statements. As a jury we had been discussing the case each time we were returned to our deliberation room so we had pretty much decided the same result. We informed the judge of that fact when he subsequently closed the case. This woman weighed in at 17 and a half stone and there was no way a mere strap of a lad who was skinny anyway, would have been able to force her into submission whether she was drunk or not. In fact she had consumed over a bottle of vodka and a couple of lagers during the day. She had been staying at the home of a friend and went out to buy some fish and chips in a local shop (they had already eaten anyway) but according to her she was lured into some local woods (some 200 yards in the opposite direction) and was assaulted but they found her shoes in another wood some distance away. The chain of events she gave just didn’t make sense to us or the judge. We think she got so drunk and incapable that she found herself indulging in some sexual activity with the lad and his mates and it turned out that the evidence pointed to the fact that she had masturbated the lad and that is what linked her DNA to his. There was no supportive evidence of her vagina having been penetrated and no sperm was found to suggest that intercourse had taken place. There was other evidence too much to repeat here but at the end of the day I would think she now faces possible charges of molesting a minor and indulging in sexual activity with a minor. I wouldn’t like to be in her boots if that is what happens. I have been released from duty for tomorrow but return on Monday ready for another case should they need me.

Shirley Anne

Posted in Justice, Law | Tagged: , , , , , , , | 3 Comments »

Trial

Posted by Shirley Anne on January 4, 2012

As my readers will know I am currently on jury service. On Tuesday I had to report to the Crown Court but it wasn’t until the middle of the afternoon that I was called to be a juror on a case. I was selected and sworn in but the trial wasn’t due to start properly until this morning. For obvious reasons I must not divulge any information about the case itself until it is over but I can say that it is one of alleged rape of a 35 year-old woman by a 15 year-old youth. It is only the first day and we have heard only part of the story yet. We have been told it may stretch until Monday. We’ll have to wait and see. I am enjoying the experience this time round much as I did when I was a juror many years ago.

Shirley Anne

Posted in Justice, Law | Tagged: , , | 4 Comments »

Back to Liverpool

Posted by Shirley Anne on January 3, 2012

Tuesday

Image by teachernz via Flickr

Well it is Tuesday morning and I am off to Liverpool today, to the Queen Elizabeth 11 Crown Court to do another stint at jury service. I have no idea if my services will be required or not, nobody does until the day itself but it would be a shame to have to take time out if I am not subsequently elected. There is a possibility that I won’t make it as a juror but I’ll have to wait and see. It was Christmas Eve when I last did some electrical work and it might be a further two weeks before I get the chance to work again but if jobs are scarce I do have work to start on at home. Late last summer E and I purchased materials and fittings for converting our downstairs toilet/cloakroom into a wet room containing a shower, toilet and wash basin but we never got round to starting the job. Presently the room is stripped of wall and floor coverings but still has a working toilet and wash basin which must be removed before we can begin the installation. Happy days again. Work at home never seems to end. We plan to completely renovate the second largest bedroom on the first floor at some point. At the moment the room is full of odds and ends which need to be thrown out or stored in the cellar, the carpet requires changing and no doubt I will need to add a couple of extra power outlets too. Then there is the furniture to buy, bed, wardrobes and such. To be fair the room hasn’t had a proper make-over for years and it really needs it. There is no special reason for doing it up but it will allow its use as a guest room. There are two spare  bedrooms on the top floor (the third bedroom is being used for storage and as an office) but they are only fitted out with the bare essentials so it would be nice to have a larger and better appointed room as one of the four main bedrooms situated on the floor below. This will mean that we have six of the seven bedrooms available for use, although E and I are using two of them. For the moment I am focused on my trips to Liverpool and all of this can wait. When it gets a little warmer I really must push to get the garage finished too but the main thing there is getting that roller door installed! No, it hasn’t been fitted yet but all that is needed is to get it raised to ceiling height and onto the brackets I fitted a few months ago, the rest should be easy. It is hard getting things done when there is no-one available to help.

Shirley Anne

Posted in House and Home, Law | Tagged: , , , , , | 2 Comments »

When does it become an intrusion?

Posted by Shirley Anne on November 19, 2011

Warning: This Area Contains Tobacco Smoke

Image by tbone_sandwich via Flickr

Recently it has been proposed my the Medical Council that there should be a complete ban on individuals smoking in their vehicles. The reasons given were that the confined spaces give rise to the build-up of dangerous chemicals to the detriment of those present, especially children. Whatever your own personal views on this becoming law, do you think it is an unwarranted infringement on the personal rights of individuals or do you think it is a reasonable request for a civilised society in which the majority consensus is to be agreed with? Apart from the hazards just mentioned there is also the danger of possible accidents occurring because of a dropped cigarette. In recent years we have seen smoking being banned in places where people congregate and this was put in place to protect those who do not smoke from the atmosphere produced by those who do. Recognising the danger to the non-smoker made sense to remove the smokers from those places whenever they wanted to feed their habit. More people do not smoke than those who do. At present I think the figures quoted point to a 20% to 80% ratio. It seems only right then to enforce such a law. Despite the objections that this would cause a drop in custom for those in the catering industry, pubs and clubs and similar places the law was passed. I don’t think it has made any difference at all to the retail industry. However, banishing smoking from public places is one thing but to extend that ban to the privacy of one’s vehicle and even private homes (which has also been suggested as a possibility), is another. How far can government intervention go and what would be the  resultant backlash if they decide to follow these suggestions and legislate in favour of them? These propositions have already been made law in some parts of the world, like Australia and elsewhere I believe.

I might add here that I am a non-smoker but I am in favour of such legislation for vehicles but not necessarily in people’s private residencess.

Shirley Anne

Posted in Environment, Government, Health, Law, Society | Tagged: , , , , , , , | 2 Comments »

Brown paper envelope

Posted by Shirley Anne on November 15, 2011

This is Swampyank's copy of "The Jury&quo...

Image via Wikipedia

Whenever I receive a brown paper envelope through the post I immediately think ‘official documents’. Formal documentation from councils, solicitors, organisations and others usually arrive in brown envelopes so it was with some trepidation I opened the brown envelope in my mail on Friday. It was a call to jury service. It has been many years since I last did jury service so I was taken by surprise to be asked again. I wonder if that is because they don’t know I have switched gender and they are treating me as a new person? There is no reason they would know I suppose. Anyway I have filled out the fom and sent it off. My duties are expected to begin on 3rd January in Liverpool, which is some twenty to twenty-two miles away. Something to look forward to I suppose. My last duty call lasted but for one day and then my services were no longer required, though I still had to attend each day for a week just in case I was needed. I doubt that I will be called upon after this time due to my age but it is still possible up and until I reach 70. At best jury service is a necessity and at worse an  inconvenience. Being self-employed I will have to submit proof of loss of earnings but that is impossible unless they accept my average daily earnings from my previous tax year. I would think having a standard fixed amount allowable refund would be sufficient but that I suppose wouldn’t suit everyone. All travelling expenses are covered of course. It will be a first for me as a woman to sit on a jury. At least the experience won’t be as bad as that in the link below….LOL

Shirley Anne

Posted in Law | Tagged: , , | 5 Comments »

I’m crying

Posted by Shirley Anne on August 9, 2011

New Testament, Old Testament

Image by thousandshipz via Flickr

I am sitting here crying. I have lots of reasons for crying, everyday things connected with relationships, respect, the sins of society, the attitudes of others, oh many things make me cry. This time though my tears are tears of joy. Have you ever cried because you were happy or because you were touched by some compassionate incident? Sometimes I even cry when listening to music! I was reading some articles in relation to Christianity and it’s stance against homosexuality, not those who engage in it but the condition itself. The Bible has strong views regarding homosexuality which can be found in both the New Testament and the Old Testament. Activists will be quick to point out that things found in the Old Testament do not necessarily apply today even if they find those writings to be untrue anyway. It is true that some of the laws as written in the Old Testament do not apply today because they were specific to the life and times of the day and were a matter of civil law. However the laws regarding sexual behaviour are a matter of moral law and do not change with the passage of time so those laws as written in the Old Testament and subsequently in the New Testament are very much still relevent today. It wasn’t this subject or anything about it that opened the floodgates in my eyes though, it was the reassurance I felt of Gods love and forgiveness when we repent. There is no difference between a Christian and anyone else for we are all sinners every one of us. A person can only claim to be a Christian when they repent of their sins and continually strive against the sin in their lives. Whilst I was reading more on this subject through reading about homosexuality and other things, I realised how much God loves me, loves us all. It’s the sin He hates, not the perpetrator. So if we don’t repent we condemn ourselves. I am crying because God loves me.

Shirley Anne

Posted in God, Jesus Christ and The Holy Spirit, Law, Morality, Relationships, Religion | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Secular law v Gods Law

Posted by Shirley Anne on February 15, 2011

In everything that concerns the exclusively earthly order of things, the Orthodox Christian is obliged to obey the law, regardless of how far it is imperfect and unfortunate. However, when compliance with legal requirements threatens his eternal salvation and involves an apostasy or commitment of another doubtless sin before God and his neighbour, the Christian is called to perform the feat of confession for the sake of God’s truth and the salvation of his soul for eternal life. He must speak out lawfully against an indisputable violation committed by society or state against the statutes and commandments of God. If this lawful action is impossible or ineffective, he must take up the position of civil disobedience (see, III. 5).

This statement forms part of a larger document issued by the Russian Orthodox Church which explains the standards by which the true Church of God scattered throughout the world are obliged to conform.

The whole document can be viewed here http://www.mospat.ru/en/documents/social-concepts/about/

I heard on the news today that the British Government is proposing a new law which will allow ‘gay’ couples, that is same-sex marriages or rather a civil ceremony to be conducted in churches throughout the land. Whether a church is allowed the freedom to refuse or not is not clear to me as yet. Depending on your stance this can either be a good thing or a bad thing. As a Christian I would disagree with such proposals and say that any church group allowing such ceremonies is not being faithful to God and His Laws. If you read fully the above document you will find that although all laws originated from the same source some are merely allowed by God because He allows us the freedom to choose. Naturally therefore, the secularists see no problem in conforming to the proposal. Personally I uphold the right for others to do as they please within secular law but for the Christian it is a matter between them and God. I do not agree however that secular law should be imposed on their religious right to conform to Gods Law within their own establishments. This should also be the rule for other faiths too. It would appear that secular society can try to impose its ideas on Christians but not the other way round. This is democracy at work! The real truth is that Christians are under pressure to conform, comply and one day even deny their faith. This is all written in Scripture as prophecy.

Shirley Anne

Posted in Law, Morality, Politics, Religion | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments »

I stand accused

Posted by Shirley Anne on December 28, 2010

As a Christian it is beholden of me to spread the Word of God, see Matthew 28:…..” 19 Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”

I make no excuses therefore to openly make a stand against things that are not in accordance with Gods will. One thing I must state first of all is that I am a sinner myself and it is only by grace that my sins can be forgiven (Ephesians 2:8-9). I have accordingly to continue to strive not to sin myself. So from time to time I will be continuing to speak out for God in this blog just as I speak about other things. I do this out of love for my Maker and for those he created…….YOU. If you have ears, listen. If eyes then see. If hearts then be open.

I was reading this article about love and how it plays an important part of a Christian’s life, or should do. If love is lacking, there is no hope for anyone. If you’ve the time and patience I encourage you to read it…..

WHAT’S LOVE GOT TO DO WITH IT?

“But I have this against you, that you have left your first love” (Revelation 2:4). Speaking to the first of the Seven Churches in Revelation Jesus confronts the Ephesians with this truth. He says many good things about them, but also points out this failing concerning love.

A few years ago singer Tina Turner had a hit song entitled “What’s Love Got To Do With It?” It demeans love as nothing more than a “second-hand emotion”. Sadly, our world, and even Christians, that is, true, born-again Christians, have a tendency to allow love to become unnecessary, something that takes second place to doing. Jesus told the Ephesians, “I know your deeds and your toil and perseverance, and that you cannot tolerate evil men, and you put to the test those who call themselves apostles, and they are not, and you found them to be false; and you have perseverance and have endured for My name’s sake, and have not grown weary” (Revelation 2:2-3). What a wonderful commendation; one that any Christian would be glad to have said about him. However, Jesus goes on to say, “But I have this against you, that you have left your first love” (Revelation 2:4).

The name, Ephesus, means “Desirable”, but what we as human beings find desirable, the Lord finds fault with. The Ephesians were known for their deeds and toil and perseverance, all things worthy of praise, and the Lord points them out as good, but something was missing.
The word deeds used here means “works or the result or object of employment”. It speaks of our day-to-day activities and the result of those activities. That can be good or bad depending on what we busy ourselves with. If we help a little old lady across the street that, of course, is good. The result being she safely comes to the other side unharmed. On the other hand if we sell drugs to a child that is bad. The result being either a drug addict or an early death. These types of deeds are obviously good or bad, but what about good deeds, from a human point of view, that God views as bad? What makes a good deed a good deed? Did not Cain and Abel both bring an offering to the Lord? Yet, only Abel’s was accepted. The story of these offerings and why God accepted Abel’s and not Cain’s is long and deep, but it comes down to love. Abel offered the best that he had, not counting the cost; Cain brought his grain offering, but not the firstfruits, not the best that he had. He had counted the cost and found it too high a price to pay. But wanting to appear to worship the Lord he went through the actions (deeds) of offering a sacrifice. But love was missing. Cain offered his sacrifice to be seen as righteous before man not God.

This is a spirit that has been found among the Lord’s followers throughout the ages. Jesus said, “The scribes and the Pharisees have seated themselves in the chair of Moses; therefore all that they tell you, do and observe, but do not do according to their deeds; for they say things and do not do them. They tie up heavy burdens and lay them on men’s shoulders, but they themselves are unwilling to move them with so much as a finger. But they do all their deeds to be noticed by men; for they broaden their phylacteries and lengthen the tassels of their garments. They love the place of honor at banquets and the chief seats in the synagogues, and respectful greetings in the market places, and being called Rabbi by men” (Matthew 23:2-7).

The deeds of the Pharisees and scribes were not necessarily wrong. It was the spirit in which they were done that brought Jesus’ condemnation. After all, He told those listening to Him to do and observe them, but not do as they did. Our righteousness is not to bring glory to us, but to the Lord. The result of the self-righteous deeds of the Pharisees and scribes was just the opposite of that; they got the glory that belongs to the Lord alone.

Christians sometimes suffer from a disease that could be called “do-gooditis”. It is as if we believe that if we do enough good deeds God will accept us. This is an idea that has plagued mankind since the dawn of time. It has such a tenacious hold on us because it appeals to the flesh. The thought of charity is repulsive to fallen man. Satan would have us believe that salvation is achieved the old fashioned way: we earn it. Satan does not care if we do good for others as long as we do it for the wrong reason, because he knows that our goodness is one of his most effective weapons he has to keep us from the salvation that God offers. Paul clearly states, “He saved us, not on the basis of deeds which we have done in righteousness, but according to His mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewing by the Holy Spirit” (Titus 3:5). Deeds without love is of value only to us. “Let us consider how to stimulate one another to love and good deeds” (Hebrews 10:24). Notice the order here: love first, then good deeds. This is the proper way to do the works of God. “Therefore they said to Him, ‘What shall we do, so that we may work the works of God?’ Jesus answered and said to them, ‘This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He has sent’” (John 6:28-29). Love begins with a knowledge of Jesus Christ. Once that knowledge begins to grow we find ourselves doing unto others as we would have them do unto us regardless whether we get recognized for it or not.

However, even beyond our deeds there are those things that we toil at. The word literally means to “cut”, implying a reducing of strength. It speaks of beating the breast in grief; a wailing as we face the worst life throws in our face. It is the things that tear at our heart and makes us fight to the point of exhaustion at times. Such are those who battle against abortion, homosexuality, pornography, child or spousal abuse, sexual promiscuity, and persecution of Christians here in America and abroad where Christians are dying for their faith at the hands of godless governments.

These and many other causes are worth fighting for and we should. Someone once said that, “All evil needs in order to triumph is for good men to do nothing”. This is true. We should fight for those things that the Lord has placed upon our hearts. Nevertheless, there is a right way and a wrong way to do this. Because these burdens upon our hearts are sometimes very painful, it is easy for us to strike out at the person rather than the sin. Is it the abortionist we fight or abortion, homosexuals or homosexuality, the pornographer or pornography, abusers or abuse, adulterers and fornicators or adultery and fornication? We must never forget that as we are fighting the good fight, Jesus died for the homosexual, the pornographer, the abuser, the adulterer, and the fornicator. David prayed, “Blessed be the LORD, my rock, who trains my hands for war, and my fingers for battle” (Psalms 144:1). Yes, we are in a war in this world, but “our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the powers, against the world forces of this darkness, against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places” (Ephesians 6:12). How hard this is! It is easier to hate someone who does things that wound us within our hearts and the hearts of our children than to love them as the Lord does.

This is not to say we should not punish evildoers or seek to pass laws that will protect society. Abortion is murder and those who practice it and deceive others into believing otherwise must be stopped. Homosexuality is a sin and those who are indoctrinating our society and especially our children with the lie that it is simply a legitimate alternate lifestyle must be exposed and resisted. Pornography is not the victimless vice the world would have us believe. Wives, children, and families are torn apart by it. Abuse toward members of our families should never be excused. Adultery is a crime that wounds the heart in a way that few ever recover from. Fornication, once condemned by society is now so common even some Christians find nothing wrong with multiple sex partners before marriage or living with someone outside the sanctity of marriage. Fatherless households are tearing the very fiber of our society apart. Our sons are not taught what it means to be a man, primary of which is to take responsibility for himself and his family. Daughters are not given the love they desperately need from the one man in their lives that can teach them of the priceless gift the Lord has given them by being a woman and sharing her life with her husband. It has come to the point that women are becoming more masculine and men are becoming more feminine. The feelings and emotions that make a woman a woman are looked upon as weaknesses as women compete with men for secular careers, placing more importance upon their jobs than their children.

The fact that so many men neglect to provide for the children they fathered by not paying child support speaks volumes about how far as a nation we have fallen. Women too have lessened the value of motherhood, forgetting the old saying, “The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world”. Who is rocking our children now? One of the jobs of the older, more mature women is “that they may encourage the young women to love their husbands, to love their children” (Titus 2:4). For years I read that verse and understood that a woman would have to learn to love a husband because men and women are so different in many ways. But not until a few years ago did I understand why a woman would have to be taught to love her children. After all, that is what maternal instinct is. Loving children just comes naturally. But Jesus warned that “because lawlessness is increased, most people’s love will grow cold” (Matthew 24:12). The word “love” here is the Greek word for divine, self-sacrificing love. It is the love that will freely give up everything, even life, for the sake of the one loved, regardless whether the love is deserved or not. Yet, in our society, lawlessness and iniquity are increasing at an ever-escalating rate and because of this even the love of a mother toward her children is becoming a burden. Hence, we have the holocaust of abortion permeating our society. Abortion is the single greatest sin our nation engages in and we are suffering the consequences of it as seen in younger and younger children committing more heinous crimes; crimes that were once only committed by adults who were so hardened within their hearts that remorse is never expressed. If women loved their children as they should abortion would cease. Further, if fathers loved their children as they should and took the leadership role God has placed upon them as men, abortion would be greatly diminished.

As Christians these are some of the things we toil at. These are the things that “cut” us deeply and sap our strength to the point we either want to give up the fight because it is too painful or lash out at the guilty person instead of the sin.

The Ephesians were commended because of their toils, but condemned for their lack of love. We must remember that even concerning those things that we feel strongly about – crime, immorality, or injustice – there is a right way and a wrong way to fight, to war if you will. We should always have the well being of the person in mind, keeping ourselves “in the love of God, waiting anxiously for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ to eternal life. And have mercy on some, who are doubting; save others, snatching them out of the fire; and on some have mercy with fear, hating even the garment polluted by the flesh” (Jude 21-23). Yes, hate the garment, but not the body.

It is easy to give up, to despair of overcoming the evil both within us and around us, but the Ephesians did not give up. They were commended for their perseverance concerning their deeds and toils. Perseverance is a Greek word that literally means “to remain under”. It speaks of steadfastness, patience, unwavering loyalty, and cheerful endurance. This is a quality few possess. So much of the time we are tempted to pray our way out of a situation or circumstance rather than to overcome it. Escapism is a condition that afflicts young Christians and old alike. We are deceived into believing that the Lord does not mean for us to suffer and we look for the nearest exit. This, however, is contradictory to the Bible. This verse in itself seems contradictory. “ No temptation has overtaken you but such as is common to man; and God is faithful, who will not allow you to be tempted beyond what you are able, but with the temptation will provide the way of escape also, so that you will be able to endure it” (1 Corinthians 10:13). It says a way of escape will be provided, but then says we will endure it. Actually, there is no contradiction. It is just that we think of escape in a different way than God does.

If a man is an alcoholic and becomes stranded upon a deserted island for a period of months and did not drink during that time, is he still an alcoholic? It can easily be proven when he is rescued that he is. Once back where alcohol is available he drinks again. Thus, while he escaped from alcohol for a few months it was only because he had no opportunity to drink. He was not cured. God does not work that way. When He causes us to escape from those things in life that bind us He does it by giving us the strength necessary to remain in our situation until we overcome it. Otherwise, we will live in constant fear that we will fall again at the next opportunity to sin. Does that make sense? If the Lord gives us the inner strength to not indulge in something, whether it is alcohol, smoking, gambling, or any number of other things then we have truly escaped from it. Not by running from it, but by overcoming it. This is why the promises given to the Seven Churches addressed in Revelation are given to the overcomers.

The Ephesians were doing this. They were not trying to pray themselves out of their circumstances. Day by day they faced life doing good; they struggled against evil as they toiled to overcome it, not just run away from the burdens God had placed upon their hearts. They were following the injunction Paul gave to the Romans. “Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good” (Romans 12:21). They stood their ground and fought the good fight.

Further, Jesus commends them for not enduring evil men. The word “endure” here means, “to lift up with the hands, to sustain, to carry a load”. The Ephesians were not about to hold up as an example any man who practiced evil; they were not going to support him in any way. The Ephesians would not sanction churches today that ordain practicing homosexuals and lift them up as examples because they are “good” people and give them financial as well as moral support in the name of tolerance.

The Ephesians are also commended for testing those who called themselves apostles. This means that they questioned very carefully those who sought to have a position of authority among them. They did not take at face value what these men said. Instead they heeded the words of Jesus: “For false Christs and false prophets will arise, and will show signs and wonders, in order to lead astray, if possible, the elect” (Mark 13:22). They understood that someone who appears righteous on the outside may be totally evil. “For such men are false apostles, deceitful workers, disguising themselves as apostles of Christ. And no wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light.” (2 Corinthians 11:13-14) The outward appearance of a person or even their ability to perform signs and wonders is no guarantee that they are born-again Christians. Only their actions on a day by day basis will let us know if they are genuine or not.

All this the Ephesians had going for them and had “not grown weary” (Revelation 2:3). Paul urged the Thessalonians toward this goal also. “But as for you, brethren, do not grow weary of doing good” (2 Thessalonians 3:13). They had persevered for Jesus; they had sought the spiritual gifts, taught and preached in Jesus’ name, increased their knowledge and wisdom, had the faith to face each day doing good and toiling to overcome evil, gave of their money and time, and if needed their very selves. So what could they possibly be lacking that Jesus would find fault with?
“But I have this against you, that you have left your first love” (Revelation 2:4). The word “left” means to “send away, to let go” and is used for a husband divorcing his wife. What Jesus is saying is that just as close as a husband is to be to his wife, to the degree that they are bound (glued) together in marriage by God, so is love – the divine, self-sacrificing love – supposed to be the foundation upon which all that we think, say, and do is based. Jesus, having washed the Disciples’ feet (including Judas Iscariot) said, “By this all men will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another” (John 13:35). Not just a love for friends and family, but a love for all God’s creation. “You have heard that it was said, ‘YOU SHALL LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR and hate your enemy.’ But I say to you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven; for He causes His sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same” (Matthew 5:43-46)? This is the attitude we are called to as Christians, even as we battle the evil around us.

What’s love got to do with it? Read 1 Corinthians chapter 13 and find out for yourself.
Terry L. Brown
Terry_L_Brown@whispersofthespirit.com

This article may be freely copied, stored, and/or reproduced in print or electronic media for non-commercial purposes provided it is done so in whole (unless written permission is obtained by the author) with the following copyright notice:

Copyright 2007: Terry L. Brown, 1176 Minuteman Street, Billings, Montana 59105-2248. Used by permission.

Unless otherwise noted: Scripture taken from the NEW AMERICAN STANDARD BIBLE, copyright 1960, 1962, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995 by The Lockman Foundation. Used by permission.

http://whispersofthespirit.com/whatslovegottodowithit.aspx

Did you get to this point? I thank you if you did.

Shirley Anne

Posted in God, Law, Morality, Religion | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Unecessary stupidity.

Posted by Shirley Anne on January 28, 2010

I have just read an article of news on Yahoo whereby a guy was fined a £60 fixed penalty and had three points put on his licence. He had been parked, with his hand-brake on I might add, at traffic lights which were against him, that is in stationary traffic and he blew his nose on a handkerchief! He was told that he wasn’t in control of his vehicle! How bloody stupid are the police for doing that? No wonder they get a bad name. I’m furious! I cannot believe how stupid some people can be and the law, if it is true is an absolute asshole in this case! The guy hasn’t paid the fine and his solicitor is pleading his case but it may go to court yet as the guy has no intentions of paying. Why he should have earned three penalty points on his licence also beggars belief. They should be instantly removed. Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr………….

Shirley Anne

Posted in Law, Motoring | Tagged: , | 7 Comments »

Suicide

Posted by Shirley Anne on September 23, 2009

There have been developments in the area concerning whether people who assist their loved ones, that is accompany them to a foreign country where they can arrange their own death, will no longer be liable to prosecution here in the UK. Suicide still remains illegal in the UK. Personally I don’t agree with suicide and that is because of my religious beliefs. People will say, ‘Why shouldn’t anyone be allowed to commit suicide if they are suffering pain or severe disability from an incurable ailment’? I guess it is because the majority rule and whatever laws have been passed are there for the benefit of the majority. Do you consider this fair? Should we, as a country, give way to the desires of the minority when they conflict with those of the rest? It wasn’t that long ago that laws were passed to protect the rights of the transgendered amonst us and those who are ‘gay’. No doubt there are many other examples. Is suicide going too far?

Shirley Anne

Posted in Law, Politics | Tagged: , , | 5 Comments »

Free at last

Posted by Shirley Anne on September 9, 2009

In the summer of 2005 a Liverpool FC football supporter named Michael Shields was in Bulgaria celebrating Liverpool’s win. He was arrested and found guilty of attempted murder of a Bulgarian man. Although he was innocent and after somebody else had confessed to the crime in the presence of many people, he was still placed in gaol for fifteen years. That was commuted to ten years a little later. After serving two and a half years in Bulgaria he was allowed to complete his sentence back in an English gaol. Today he was given a Royal Pardon by the British Government and he is now free. However, a pardon does not mean that his name has been cleared from any wrongdoing but it is a step in the right direction. I wish him and his family the best during these happier days and hope true justice will be served in due course.
It is so sad that this sort of thing can so easily happen, especially in a foreign country where the laws are different. How many more incidences like this are played out unnoticed with the accused remaining in gaol when they are innocent?

Shirley Anne

Posted in Justice, Law | Tagged: , , | 2 Comments »